No. 22-7891

Ronald James Littlefield v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2023-06-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment fundamental-fairness judicial-notice pro-se-litigant procedural-due-process state-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can a state tribunal deprive litigants to that tribunal equal protection of the law and even handed justice based upon a commitment offense?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW CAN A STATE TRIBUNAL DEPRIVE LITIGANTS TO. THAT TRIBUNAL EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW AND EVEN HANDED JUSTICE BASED UPON A COMMITMENT OFFENSE? DOES THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT MANDATE. EQUAL TREATMENT OF STATE COURT LITIGANTS? CAN ADEQUATE ACCESS TO THE COURTS BE IMPEDED BY A STATE COURT BY THEIR REFUSAL TO ENTERTAIN AND/OR RULE ON MOTION NOT FILED BY ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE? . DOES PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS OF LAW MANDATE THAT A STATE COURT RULE ON PENDING MOTIONS FILED BY PRO SE LITIGANTS? CAN A STATE TRIBUNAL DEPRIVE LITIGANTS OF FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS AND JUSTICE BY THEIR REFUSAL TO RULE ON OR PROVIDE OPINION TO A PENDING MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE? i . /I i. q .

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 31, 2023)

Attorneys

Ronald Littlefield
Ronald James Littlefield — Petitioner
Ronald James Littlefield — Petitioner