No. 23-5492

Dennis Christensen v. Barry Reddish, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-08-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-rights due-process handwritten-petition illegible-document potential-legal-issue prison-law-library pro-se-litigant standing unclear-text unreadable-text
Latest Conference: 2023-10-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the case without providing the petitioner an opportunity to amend the complaint to show that the law library access is inadequate for litigating the case

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Wa abuse oe discretion fir ridel le dutriyle Court 6 dismiss Case, Numbar 27 9d-ev~ O0)4)MmttPar w ith out chance to amend to chow cout why /0 hou moath ly at Jew hf rary is not adepualt fo Lilo ag r\ caning Pal cue +6 court Ww hen the only access 10 | oval mattrval books, curelau, motion axample( (aay Jeral mace ral ae only while physica lly in the low hibravy as the la J | ocary loan out NO media. whatsoever, to prisoners — iA genera populutan,

Docket Entries

2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-06-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 2, 2023)

Attorneys

Dennis Christensen
Dennis Christensen — Petitioner
Dennis Christensen — Petitioner