Whether a federal judge can set a uniform national standard for ADA accommodation and preempt state court rules, and whether California courts systematically discriminate against disabled pro se litigants

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Has one federal judge set the uniform national standard! for ending discrimination based on disability, and ‘impeached’ the state courts’ rules and policies on ADA accommodation by insisting on radically contradictory outcomes on the concurrent accommodation of the same disabled pro se litigant? Since the ADA’s clear statement places the federal court in preemptive position to uniformly interpret and enforce the ADA (to protect the same person), may the hierarchy of California courts who have _ knowledge of the federal orders? expressly and concurrently violate? this federal standard? What remedial action must be applied DURING state litigation to protect the UNACCOMMODATED disabled pro se litigant, and HOW must ADA accommodation be provided to him, in order to minimize the duration and burden of litigation, and to make the victim equal in opportunity to succeed in litigation and to prevent further harm? 2. Does California jurisprudence systemically‘ discriminate based on disability by eliminating rights, constitutional privileges and immunities, and access to legal remedies for self-represented litigants with invisible disabilities? 1 See