Should the lower courts have been so stringent in limiting their review to only one exception of Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) in deciding whether to grant relief to a pro se litigant?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI SHOULD BE GRANTED WHERE BOTH THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT AND THE U.S.COURT OF APPEALS HAS DEPARTED FROM THE ACCEPTED AND USUAL COURSE OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AS TO CALL FOR AN EXERCISE OF THIS COURT'S SUPERVISORY POWER. IN LIGHT OF THE GENEROUS STANDARD AFFORDED TO PRO SE LITIGANTS IN PLEADING THEIR CAUSES OF ACTIONS, HAINES, 404 U.S. 520, 521; 92 S CT 594, THE QUESTION BECOMES, SHOULD THE LOWER COURTS HAVE BEEN SO STRINGENT IN LIMITING ITS REVIEW TO ONLY ONE EXCEPTION OF FED, R. CIV. PROC. 60(B) IN DECIDING WHETHER TO GRANT RELIEF. :