Can state officers discriminate against pro se litigants?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Can State officers in the trial court and . appellate court act directly in conflict with well-established precedent set by the Supreme Court which recommends that pro se litigants be given leniency but in the instant two cases there was : an abuse of power against pro se status? Whether this Court should resolve the question of the Federal Law of the Constitution’s prohibition against discrimination based on litigants’ pro se ; status and color by the state officers who were not following the law. (e.g. Constitution, Florida Statutes etc.). These are issues of great public importance concerning the Constitutional rights of colored people, with far reaching implications to the public where people lose their houses and lifesavings. This court needs to resolve a question of Federal law of fundamental due process. Can judicial officers violate fundamental due process by not holding the hearing per notice, stop a pro se litigant in the middle of the hearing and also prevent a meaningful hearing with a threat of the contempt of the court? This Court should resolve the conflicting decision of the state court of last resort with other state courts of last resort and also conflicting decision of other states regarding mandatory pre suit mediation FS 720.311. This is a question of exceptional importance in order to prevent clogging of the docket with noncompliant suits? ii Can state officer discriminate and retaliate pro se litigants by preventing the opportunity to file an appeal by not giving an order on reconsideration . motion? Can an attorney, a court officer, file a document with false statements with his signature during the representation in the official record of HOA file to fulfil the presuit notice requirement to file a lien and eventually foreclose the house? This is a question of great public importance because it challenges the public trust in the integrity of the judicial system of the United States of America. Can state officers ignore FS Statutes 817.535 (recently enacted in 2018) where the filing of the false document in the official record of an HOA with an eye towards the foreclosure is permitted? This Court needs to resolve a question: Can an attorney and state officers, be allowed to defy and defile FS Statutes 57.105 and 768.79 against pro se litigants by not following any rules which are required by FS? The above two FS are derogation of the common law and needs to be followed to the letter of the law. This Court need to affirm that filing : of 57.105 and 768.79 in bad faith is also a reason for ; counter sanction. Did the attorneys attempts to drive out the Pro Se Plaintiffs from the “legend golf community” of Isleworth of Tiger Woods and Bay Hill of Arnold Palmer in Florida on the basis of her race occur in violation of 42 U.S.C. §1981?