Whether the state appeal courts have the right based on an obvious prejudice and bias to refuse due process to a foreign pro se litigant. The denial is so obvious, persistent and omnipresent in this case, as well as the corruption, that this court must correct this quickly to have still a meaningful constitution as the rights denied to the foreign Pro se litigant are constitutional in nature: due process, right to appeal, etc.?

Whether the state appeal courts have the right based on an obvious prejudice and bias to refuse due process to a foreign pro se litigant