Does the United States Supreme Court have the authority to review the underlying merits of an issue when the action being challenged is a petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the United States Supreme Court have the authority to review the underlying merits of an issue when the action being challenged is a petition for : writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel? (Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)) ; 2. Should an issue that was raised for the first time by the pro se litigant in his . initial brief be reviewable on a petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel if counsel does not raise it himself in an Anders brief? . 8. Should an involuntary incriminating statement be automatically suppressed when the accused was in the intensive care unit of a hospital and being given medications that have known debilitating side effects? 4. Should a prejudicial improper statement of the law by a state attorney in closing arguments require automatic reversal when the nature of the accused case involves a law enforcement officer being injured due to the increased burden placed upon him? 5. Should a case be automatically reversed for a retrial when it was adequately ; proven that portions of trial transcript are missing? --6. Should a judgment of acquittal motion be granted when there is a defense of lack of intent and all of the evidence used against the accused was based on proven false evidence? i 7. Should a judgment of acquittal motion be granted when there is no body camera evidence depicting the alleged crime during a planned take down operation a in which officers where staged in position to take the accused into custody despite testimony from the police that the evidence should exist? . 8... Should dual convictions for aggravated battery and attempted murder be ; upheld when there is only one episode of conduct with one victim with no temporal break whatsoever? 9. Should consecutive sentences be imposed for the same episode of conduct with the same victim with no temporal break whatsoever? ii