No. 24-6911
IFP
Tags: court-rule-amendment jury-inaccuracies legal-remedy michigan-supreme-court pro-se-litigant procedural-due-process
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-05-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Michigan Supreme Court's failure to apply the May 1, 2021 amendment to MCR 6.502(D) and the Castro v. United States holding constitutes a remedy-worthy issue for pro se litigants
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : question (s) presented I ASKED THE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT TO RECONSIDER: 1). WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT'S FAILURE CRAFTED BY THE MAY 1 , 2021 AMENDMENT OF MCR MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT WORTHY OF REMEDY. (p.I4).OF THE NOTIFICATIONS 6.502(D) BY THE 2). WHETHER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT'S HOLDING IN CASTRO 540 U.S. 375 (2003) APPLIES TO MICHIGAN'S PRO v UNITED STATES, PER LITIGANTS, (p.14). 1997 JURY INACCURACIES Wi'THIN THE JULY 2, WORTHY OF REMEDY (
Docket Entries
2025-06-02
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
2025-03-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2025)