Whether the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denial of Petitioner's timely and duly filed Appeal, without any lawful judicial reasoning or analysis to support their decisions whatsoever deprives a pro se litigant of their right to petition the government or the redress of grievances and to the enjoy meaningful access to the Court's in violation of the 1st and 14 Amendment?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Whether the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denial of Petitioner’s timely and duly filed Appeal, without ’ any lawful judicial reasoning or analysis to support their decisions whatsoever deprives a pro se litigant of their right to petition the government or the redress of grievances and to the enjoy meaningful access to the Court’s in violation of the 1st and 14 Amendment? 2) Whether the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, denying Petitioner’s timely and proper Petition for rehearing, without any explanation as to facts or case law involved, or the legal or factual basis upon which their decision rested, comports with the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clauses of the 14% Amendment? 3) Whether the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia’s decision to dismiss Petitioner’s appeal, holding that it ‘lacks jurisdiction to review an unelaborated decision from a district court that is issued without lawful opinion or explanation’ deprives a pro se litigant of his right to petition his government for the redress of grievance or is violation of right to be heard in a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner in violation of the Due Process Clause of the 14t Amendment? 4) Whether the court of Appeals for the District of Columbia can deny one the due process right to seek review of an interlocutory order after submitting a timely notice of appeal after the final order in the case? : 1|Page