No. 19-1202
Thomas Taffe, et al. v. First National Bank of Alaska
Response Waived
Tags: access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process jury-trial legal-standards pro-se pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants standing summary-judgment systemic-bias
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did a systemic bias against pro se litigants lead to the unconstitutional denial of Petitioners' right to a jury trial in this case?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did a systemic bias against pro se litigants lead to the unconstitutional denial of Petitioners’ right to a jury trial in this case? (a) Did the summary judgment granted by the Alaska Superior Court recklessly violate state and federal legal standards? (b) Did the Alaska Supreme Court fail to address the serious mistakes made by the Superior Court? ii Il.
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-17
Waiver of right of respondent First National Bank of Alaska to respond filed.
2020-01-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 8, 2020)
Attorneys
First National Bank of Alaska
Bruce Allyn Moore — Landye Bennett Blumstein LLP, Respondent
Bruce Allyn Moore — Landye Bennett Blumstein LLP, Respondent