No. 24-6751

Victoria Lunn Jones v. Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-03-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: court-jurisdiction eeoc-guidelines judicial-procedure pro-se-litigant service-of-process summary-judgment
Key Terms:
EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference: 2025-06-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was the Respondent's Reply to Plaintiff's Response In Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment filed on September 13, 2023, but the process of service was not completed for service to a Pro Se Litigant that does not file electronically?

Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Was the Respondent's Reply to Plaintiff's Response In Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment filed on September 13, 2023, but the process of service was not completed for service to a Pro Se Litigant that does not file electronically? This can be found on the page "Reasons for Granting the Petition." Will the Petitioners Opposition to Summary Judgment stand without opposition because the documents were not timely served? 2. Did the U. S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) follow proper guidelines during the charge process? 3. How can the Federal Court System ignore and allow U. S. Senator Lindsey Graham to use his position as a sworn officer of the Courts to intervene and weaponize the U. S. Justice System during his tenure as Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman, U. S. Senator, along with the Respondents, their counsel and countless others to prevent justice from being served in this case?

Docket Entries

2025-06-23
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2025.
2025-04-28
2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-25
Waiver of right of respondent Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated to respond filed.
2025-02-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 11, 2025)

Attorneys

Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated
Danny Michael HenthorneOlgetree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, Respondent
Danny Michael HenthorneOlgetree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, Respondent
Victoria Lunn Jones
Victoria Lunn Jones — Petitioner
Victoria Lunn Jones — Petitioner