No. 18-6314

Vilaychith Khouanmany v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-10-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appointment-of-counsel career-offender civil-rights,due-process,criminal-procedure,senten criminal-procedure due-process excessive-sentences habeas-corpus pro-se-litigant procedural-due-process right-to-bail right-to-counsel sentence-enhancements sentencing speedy-trial
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the denial of appealability of case no. 17-1243 was proper when the issues of career offender, enhancements of priors, and excessive sentences were raised

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Is Denying Appealbity of case no.17-1243 when the issues of career offender, enhancements of my priors and excessives sentences, and was ‘unfairly denied right to bail to fight her case? 2. How can an indigent prisoner with No Legal knowlegé be prepared to file a Habeas in the strick time limits, where the court denied appointment of counsel? 3.Is it fair for an indigent prisoner to file such a complicated brief in such short period of time? 4. Is it fair to bring an appeal with a type writer with the time limit is too short? . 5. Is it Fair to bring an appeal with inadequate law libray and limited time in law library? : 6. Is it fair for the court NOT to follow the Law in the "Speedy Trial§3161" : Time limits . — and exclusions, they granted an extension due to overly complicated bearer such as only .. | having access to a type writer NOT having sufficient access to State and Federcl Laws due | to the fact that petitioner is NOT an Attorney and NOT learning the LAW? | 7. Is it unreasonable to request the court to appoint a counsel? : \ 8. Is it NOT unreasonable for this Honorable Court to appoint petitioner counsel? . : L , ~ ‘

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2018-11-27
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2018-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.
2018-10-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2018)

Attorneys

United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Vilaychith Khouanmany
Vilaychith Khouanmany — Petitioner
Vilaychith Khouanmany — Petitioner