Whether the court had federal question jurisdiction to hear the petitioner's appeal, and if not, should the court have transferred the appeal to the court having the proper jurisdiction to hear the appeal?

Question Presented for Review: Whether the court had federal question jurisdiction to hear the petitioner’s appeal, and if not, should the court have transferred the appeal to the court having the proper jurisdiction to hear the appeal? i 4 II. Parties to Proceeding and Related Cases ; The petitioner certifies that the following parties have an interest in the outcome of this case: (1) _ Michael Anthony Henry-Bey, in propria persona, sui juris. (2.) Respondent, Hector Castro, represented by attorney Peter M. Armold. (3.) Respondent, Carmela Bautisa, represented by attorney Peter M. Armold. (4.) Respondent, BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS (5.) Respondent, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON . (6.) Respondent, MAXIM PROPERTIES. (7.) Respondent, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC (8.) Respondent, SHERWOOD LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Represented by the law firm of Gaebe, Mullen, Antonelli & Dimatteo. (9.) Trial Judge, U.S. District Judge, Robin L. Rosenburg, for the Southern District of Florida. _ (10.) Trial Judge, Howard Coates Jr, Circuit Judge for the 15% Judicial Circuit, c Palm Beach, Florida. . Related Cases: (1.)} Henry-Bey vs. Castro, et al., Case No. 50-2019-CA 009698, The Circuit Court of the 15h Judicial Circuit for Palm Beach, Florida. Judgment entered 05/05/2020. (2.) . Henry-Bey vs. Castro, et al., Case No. 9:19-cv-81281-RLR, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida. Judgment entered on 10/09/2019. (3.) Henry-Bey vs. Castro, et al., Case No. 20-1125, The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Judgment entered on 03/26/2020. ii / ‘ III.