No. 20-6506

Andy Buxton v. Iva C. Dougherty, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2020-12-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-procedure discovery due-process pro-se-litigant standing
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)

federal courts should liberally construe a pro se litigant Complaint in need of appointed Counsel during the pandme?

Is the constitutional doctrine available to a pro se prisoner in a civil litigations in which par cases wrh a petitiones is represented by counsel?

If the sparingly evidence Weakor stray isitenough IS for ajirg to deeide? Dr is it right for te cout to dearde, weak vidence fars onesde arlos to make credible determmatos whether Basid an plantifs case isit te functon of te cout to assme fe role ot fe Suficent t oe at er S

Can a pro se plaintiff berny thut he is prose and relord lealy Shows based on scheduliy mattes, at the lorrectonal Institution which didt give him adequate tine fordisveng?

Ifa professiona hasbe disiplhid nte supee Cou or his several track records ot Misconduct. For te sake of a prose.Can te couts acept the cear incrcerated plaintifr plantif proced to te ext p rocedi elord and let the 3ypassig the CoM lequire ents and to poude assistace to prose litgent and ponde mtie sterd Alore 14th Amerdent Right to fubrcated evidence

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2021-01-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 4, 2021)

Attorneys

Andy Buxton
Andy Buxton — Petitioner