Whether an Indigent Pro Se Petitioner is Entitled to counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED. 1. Whether an Indigent Pro Se Petitioner Entitled to counsel; where DNA Testing Results and Video Recording exist; but, never given to the trial attorney at the trial, despite ominibus Motion For Discovery Prior to Trial. ; 2. Whether a failure to disclose DNA Testing Results and Video Recording is a clear violation in the case of Thompson v. Greene, . 427 F. 3d 263 (4 Cir. 2005); and, 3. Whether the Honorable Judge Charles J. Peters violated Maryland Rule Chapter 744 of The Law of Maryland Criminal Oo Procedure Article 4-332 (e)(3) & (d), (d)(10) and (d)(13) © P. age ne _ STATUTES AND RULES Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United . States Constitution. : Maryland Laws Chapter 744 Criminal Procedure Article 8-301. Maryland Rules 4-332 (d)(7) and 4-332 (d)(8) . p A9€ \> . .