No. 19-834

In Re Philippe Buhannic

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2020-01-02
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: appeal appellate-review constitutional-rights due-process foreign-litigant judicial-bias legal-discrimination pro-se pro-se-litigant state-courts
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the state courts have the right to refuse due process to a foreign pro-se-litigant

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the state courts, have the right based _ : on an obvious prejudice and bias to refuse due process : to a foreign Pro se litigant. The denial is so obvious, . persistent and omnipresent, the collusion so obvious . in this case that this court must correct this quickly a to have still a meaningful constitution as the rights denied to the foreign Pro se litigant are constitutional ’ in nature: due process, right to appeal, etc.? ii . . ' LIST OF PROCEEDINGS BELOW . New York Appellate Division, First Department ; ' Case No. 653624/16-7543 . Philippe Buhannic, et al, v. Tradingscreen, Inc., et al, ; — Decision Date: November 12, 2019 , : — Supreme Court of the State of New York County of . New York Commercial Division Part 60 -* Index No. 653624/2016 a ; Philippe Buhannic and Patrick Buhannic, Individ; . ually and Derivatively on Behalf of Tradingscreen, ; Inc., v. Tradingscreen Inc.; Pierre Schroeder; Piero Grandi, Frank Placenti: Robert Trudeau; TCV VI, ; L.P.,and TCV Member Fund, L.P. Decision Date: December 6, 2018

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-21
Waiver of right of respondent Supreme Court of the State of New York to respond filed.
2020-01-13
Waiver of right of respondents TradingScreen Inc., Pierre Schroeder, Piero Grandi to respond filed.
2019-12-24
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due February 3, 2020)

Attorneys

In Re Philippe Buhannic
Philippe Buhannic — Petitioner
Philippe Buhannic — Petitioner
Supreme Court of the State of New York
Barbara Dale UnderwoodSolicitor General, Respondent
Barbara Dale UnderwoodSolicitor General, Respondent
TradingScreen Inc., Pierre Schroeder, Piero Grandi
Peter Curtis NegerMorgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Respondent
Peter Curtis NegerMorgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Respondent
John M. VassosMorgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Respondent
John M. VassosMorgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Respondent