No. 21-7383

Francis B. Armah v. Janet Dowling, Warden

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-03-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: abrogation access-to-courts appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review pro-se pro-se-litigant supreme-court-precedent tenth-circuit
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-05-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rendered an unreasonable application of Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631 (2010) without consideration of Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977), abrogated by Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343 (1996), when denying Petitioner Armah, a pro se litigant, a certificate of appealability

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rendered an unreasonable application of Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631 (2010) without consideration of Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977), abrogated by Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343 (1996), when denying Petitioner Armah, a pro se litigant, a certificate of appealability? ii , .

Docket Entries

2022-05-16
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2022)

Attorneys

Francis B. Armah
Francis B. Armah — Petitioner
Francis B. Armah — Petitioner