Francis B. Armah v. Janet Dowling, Warden
HabeasCorpus
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rendered an unreasonable application of Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631 (2010) without consideration of Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977), abrogated by Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343 (1996), when denying Petitioner Armah, a pro se litigant, a certificate of appealability
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rendered an unreasonable application of Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631 (2010) without consideration of Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977), abrogated by Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343 (1996), when denying Petitioner Armah, a pro se litigant, a certificate of appealability? ii , .