No. 20-7888
James Arthur Ross v. Steven Shelton, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appointment-of-counsel civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-discretion medical-treatment pro-se-litigant procedural-fairness standing summary-judgment
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-05-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the District Court abuse its discretion in refusing to appoint counsel?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
LIST OF ALL PARTIES *All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all
Docket Entries
2021-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
2021-05-10
Waiver of right of respondent Steven Shelton, et al. to respond filed.
2021-04-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 1, 2021)
Attorneys
James Arthur Ross
James Arthur Ross — Petitioner
Steven Shelton, et al.
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent