No. 21-8235
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: attorney-diligence civil-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment indigent-litigants parental-rights pro-se pro-se-litigant waiver-of-appeal
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Arkansas Court's application of 'attorney diligence' waiver of right to appeal rules to pro se litigants in private termination of parental rights proceedings violates Fourteenth Amendment due process rights of pro se and indigent litigants
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW . 1. Whether the Arkansas Court’s application of “attorney diligence” waiver of right to appeal rules to pro se litigants in private termination of parental rights proceedings violates Fourteenth Amendment due process rights of pro se and indigent litigants. , | | il REDACTED VERSION
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-21
Waiver of right of respondent Natasha Davis to respond filed.
2022-06-27
Motion (21M133) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record Granted.
2022-06-07
MOTION (21M133) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-03-16
Motion (21M133) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed.
2022-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 27, 2022)
Attorneys
Natasha Davis
James R. Wallace — James R. Wallace, Attorney at Law, Respondent
James R. Wallace — James R. Wallace, Attorney at Law, Respondent