Whether a district court judge and a magistrate conducting a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 IFP screening acted on an excess of discretion and beyond the limits of law if they incorrectly and unfairly misconstrue and misrepresent the indigent pro-se plaintiff's claims, ordinary and clear statements and language in the pleading of a civil rights complaint

No question identified. : TE Pention FoR writ oF CEaTORAR PETITIONER uch VARGAS HEREMY PeTirionS Fok wair of CEeRrioRat? TO REVIEW THE UNITED STATES Court of APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CRT MARCH I, 20/6 DEcsion IN CasE NO 16-55 316 TO AFFIRM THE UNITED STATES DisTRICr CouRT FoR THE CEnwTRAL DisTeieT or CAUFORNIA EAsT Division MAY G,2ole Decision To AENY PETITIONERS «APPLICATION TO PRocee) IN FORMA PAuPERIS CrFP) Awd TO Dismiss THE PerirwonEAS 42 U.S.C. G 1983 Action. SID Qovesrons HERE. PRESEWTED. 1. WHETHER A DisrRicr Covrr _Toice and Aer MAGISTRATE ConducrinG A OB o.5.€ § 1918 DFP screesinG& Acrs oN AN Excess of \i<ckETION AND REtoWd THE LiktTS OF Law DF THEY INCORRECTLY AND UNFAIRLY MiscanisTRue AND Mis REPRESENT . THE oNWMiGentT PRO-sE Lat PERSon’s PLAN, ORMNARY AND CLEAR STATE MEWTS Add LANGUAGE IN THE PLEAMNG GFA Cw RIGHTS . CamPLAINT AND i SUCH A MANNER THAT CAUSES MuissTATEMENTS AAA MISIATERPRETATION OF THE PLAINTIFFS AeTUAL STATEMENTS AWD THE Factual ALLEEATIONS SET FoRTH ew ree Inia CoMPLAINT PLEADING AWD In ORDER TO UNFALALY Dent THE IN’GENT PRo-se Piawrires ICFP APPucaTiON Ar THE INITIAL Sc REENING STAGE on GRouN\S THAT THE PLawTIFE FAILED 1 STATE & calm, THE CUAIM. 146 FAWVoLous OR SEEKS DAMAGES Fant IMMUWE Reres dane s Aut; Har ARE BASED ON CLEAR OASECTIVELY AePARENT MISREBRESENTATIONS ANA MISSTATEMENTS. OF THE MATERAL FACTUAL. ALLEGATIONS S&T FoRvH Inf THE Aervac ComPraiwt PLEADING ? IP THE AWSWER TO THE AROVE Question 1. 15 _YEs THEN, a4 . i 2. WHETHER , Socu ConBirions , DF THEY Exist IN THIS CASE AS DesScRMED anove , (re. & Disreicr Covar <S incoRAtct Aud uneak Dewar of DFP areticanond AND Dismissar af AN INMGENT, PRoSe, Lat PERSONS Cie RIGHTS Acran ONTHE PRETEXTS THAT PLAINTIFF FAILEA TO STATE AD Clam”) THE CLAIM 1%. FRoLols ok: maLiGous. aR. SEEKS, DaMaGEs FROM, itmunt, DEFEWDANT, But. THAT,.,, ARE AASEX ON OASECTIVELY APtAR ENT, MISREPRESEWTATIONS AND MAISSTATEM ETS OF THE Actua FAetUAL ALLEGATIONS aw) LancuAce Ser roam es me ComPanir Peas) ,WOULD EQuare A® BE TANTAMOUNT To UN CoNsTITUTIONAL DeEPRwavon Or THE RIGHT TO ACCESS AUsTtice AND Access to. THE Courrs OF LAW WW ViecarnonN OF ARtTece ILD oF rune vnired Stares Consriturien Av) THE StvenTH AMEN DMEM 5 AodN SPECIALLY. IF AFTER A FAIR IMPARTIAL. AND ComPlere READIG OF THE PLEAMAG, IN A LIGHT rtost” FAVORAMLE TO THE PRo-SE PLAINNFE, AND ACCEPTING.» -ALL FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS AS TRUE, IT 1S ORTECTWELT APPARENT THAT THE INNGENT PRo-se PLAINMFE HAS a Facer Plead Surmcent Facets TO STATE Vaud CoGnizAate Clams oF Viocanon or Federa Constiunon) Civ Ricurs. ? 3. WHETHER, A DesTRcr Cover (mMagieTRATE oR rudGe ) Acrs IN Excess oF Its DISCRETION ANd REYOND tHE Limite OF LAW DuRwWG A 28 USC. LIGIS scREEMANG OVER THE FACIAL PLEADING OF AN INDIGENT LAY PERSANS Ci RIGHTS COmPLAINT ANN IFPR Aptuteatiod oF THe = Digrercr Covar Makes FAcTuAL Findings ON WHiCH IF RELEN to Enrer AECSads Tro DENY DEP APPucatION Aad Desmiss THE Cine Ricurs Aertan yor without conducring Ant TIPE oF ANWERS ARIAL ti Evidaeanary HEARING IN ORDER TH ADXEQvVATELY REsorve GEnuin€ Quesmans OF Facts, BuT RATHER MAKES FINDING OF FactS BASED oN tinaT OAXECTIVELT APPEARS TO BE PRE MisPosen , PERsower , ExrRASUMCAL Freed Revers, DDEALS And/oR ConctecruRES THAT ARE UNsuPPoRTED By THE CASE REcaRDS OR UNSvPPORTED AY PRevalunaG AUTHORITIVE LAWS And/oR THAT Weee BASED ON Facts and INFORMATION THAT COLD NOT Have KEEN LEARNED DURING ANY PROCEEDINGS THAT TOOK Place ink THE CASE ? 4. WHETHER , Fem FINMNGS MAE AY A LoweR DETRICT Covurr Coracurrare Ant/on stuace ) THAT ARE NOT SuPPORTED BY THE RecoR’ NoR ANY FACT oR INFORMATION THAT Coutd HAVE BEEN LEARWED Iv THE PROCEEDINGS OF THIS CASE, Bur THar RarvEeR APPEAR To AE AASED ON THE CouRr’s CMAGTRATE of UdCE) PREMS Posed 3 PERSONAL awh EXTRAZUMCAL Fixed Reuers, LdEacs Canaterurt€s And oa PARTIAL iWetinartoNSs Constirote GRounis REQWANG TUdical DisauaurrcaTion Add RECUSAL FRom THE PRoceEMN GSS SPEcsaLLY IF in) EVERY INSTANCE Suc PREsudCAL FINDINGS DEMoOwsTRATE & QEEPSEATED