No. 18-8354
Anthony K. Anderson v. Jerry Howell, Warden, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-rights district-court due-process exhaustion-doctrine federal-district-court federal-habeas habeas-corpus post-conviction post-conviction-review pro-se pro-se-litigant protective-petition standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a Federal District Court Unfairly Precluded pro se Prisoner Litigant Anthony Anderson's Future Ability to a Federal Habeas Review of his Nevada Convictions
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether a Federal District Court Unfairly Precluded pro se Prisoner Litigant Anthony Anderson’s Future Ability to a Federal Habeas Review of his Nevada Convictions When the District Court Ruled Upon a Protective Petition on the Merits and Without Briefing with the Knowledge that Anderson was Still Exhausting his Post-Conviction Claims in Nevada Courts? i
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 8, 2019)
Attorneys
Anthony K. Anderson
Jason F Carr — Federal Public Defenders Office, Petitioner
Jason F Carr — Federal Public Defenders Office, Petitioner