Whether the lower court and defense counsel violated federal rules of civil procedure, due process, and the appellant's constitutional rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Where Defense Counsels and the Lower Court blatantly violate, and ignore Federal Rule of Civil Procedures, Precepts, and Statutes in handling Appellant’s case. 1st, where both parties took full advantage of : (Pro-Se) Appellant’s little knowledge of the law. From Defense party, blatantly not providing Appellant’s request, for “production of documents” in their possession (which was requested early in the process and in good faith) but to no avail. 2nd, the Lower Court totally “excluding” Appellant’s proffered exhibits/direct evidence in defense of Appellant’s case, prohibiting its merits to be fairly judged. 3rd, in addition, Lower Court “depriving” Appellant of his rights under “due process of law”, called “Due Process Violation” is when governmental actors violate and frustrate the fairness of proceedings, or when a judge is biased against a party in a civil action. Appellant is asking the question of whether the government’s “deprivation” (of due process) is/ was justified by a sufficient purpose? Under what circumstances or process should a Pro-Se Appellant “request” in order for him to be provided “Right to Due Process of Law?”, “Right to a Fair, Impartial Jury Trial?”, thereby purging the taint from depriving Appellant’s Constitutional Rights, that have been violated.