No. 18-6730

William Ramirez, et ux. v. Superior Court of California, El Dorado County, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2018-11-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure default default-judgment due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment merits-based-adjudication pro-se pro-se-litigant relief-from-default state-court state-court-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-01-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should a pro se petitioner reasonably expect relief from default as a part of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (Rule 14.1(a)) 1. Should a pro se petitioner reasonably expect relief from default as a part of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, if all criteria for said relief detailed in applicable statutes and/or rules of court have been met, and given that petitioner is filing a petition for review in a state supreme court and that said petition for review is their last resort at the state court level? 2. Is the Fourteenth Amendment’s “equal protection” clause applicable to state statutes and/or rules of court regulating relief from default, when said rules make it plain that cases should be resolved on their merits and not on technicality, when other litigants before the same court have been granted relief, and provided a party can prove that said relief from default is just? i \

Docket Entries

2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-12-06
Waiver of right of respondent Megan Mangiaracina to respond filed.
2018-11-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 19, 2018)

Attorneys

Megan Mangiaracina
Scott W. SouersAlling & Jillson, Ltd., Respondent
Scott W. SouersAlling & Jillson, Ltd., Respondent
William Ramirez, et ux.
William Ramirez — Petitioner
William Ramirez — Petitioner