No. 18-9373
David Shu v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-act discrimination-claim due-process jury-trial-right pleading-standards pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-dismissal standing title-vii
Key Terms:
EmploymentDiscrimina
EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a Title VII discrimination case drafted by a pro se US citizen has been improperly dismissed for length despite the viability of the claims?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Question1: “Whether it's proper that a Title VII of the Civil Rights Act discrimination case drafted by a pro se US citizen whose native language is not English has been dismissed with prejudice for the reason of the 95-page pleading paper being too long, not up to the standard drafted by lawyers and the district court ruled without considering the viability, plausibility and the strength of the case?" Question 2: . “Whether the Petitioner's Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial was deprived?” a
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent Megan Brennan, Postmaster General to respond filed.
2019-05-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2019)
Attorneys
Megan Brennan, Postmaster General
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent