No. 19-7327
Antonio Macli v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability claim-by-claim claim-determination constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-hearing federal-court federal-courts habeas-corpus reasonable-jurists
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a federal habeas court have to determine the need for an evidentiary hearing on a claim by claim basis?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED . . Question One : Does a federal habeas court have to determine the need for an evidentiary hearing on a claim by claim basis? . Question Two When one court grants a certificate of appealability on a particular question, does that inherently make the question debatable among reasonable jurists for any subsequent courts? é x :
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-12-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 18, 2020)
2019-10-11
Application (19A397) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until December 16, 2019.
2019-10-01
Application (19A397) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 17, 2019 to December 16, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent