No. 21-6197

Lance Arnold Kingbird v. Vicki Janssen, Warden

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability circuit-split federal-court-procedure federal-courts habeas-corpus judicial-review reasonable-jurists similar-facts statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a federal court may find that 'reasonable jurists would not disagree' about the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 where other courts have resolved similar issues favorably to the habeas petitioner

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. In deciding whether to issue a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, may a federal court find that “reasonable jurists would not disagree” about the denial of relief where other courts have resolved these issues, on similar facts, in a manner favorable to habeas petitioner’s position? 2

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-29
Waiver of right of respondent Vicki Jasnssen, Warden to respond filed.
2021-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 6, 2021)

Attorneys

Lance Kingbird
Zachary Allen LongsdorfLongsdorf Law Firm PLC, Petitioner
Zachary Allen LongsdorfLongsdorf Law Firm PLC, Petitioner
Vicki Jasnssen, Warden
David P. FrankBeltrami County Attorney's Office, Respondent
David P. FrankBeltrami County Attorney's Office, Respondent