No. 21-5015

Reginald Franklin v. Robert LeGrand, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: certificate-of-appealability due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ninth-circuit post-conviction post-conviction-relief reasonable-jurists trial-counsel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit clearly erred in denying Franklin's request for a certificate of appealability

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit clearly erred in denying Franklin’s request for a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would find it debatable whether Franklin could show he was deprived of the ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and on post-conviction? i

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-30
Waiver of right of respondent Robert LeGrand, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
2021-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 5, 2021)

Attorneys

Reginald Franklin
Jonathan Michael KirshbaumLaw Offices of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Jonathan Michael KirshbaumLaw Offices of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Robert LeGrand, Warden, et al.
Jessica E. PerlickOffice of the Nevada Attorney General, Respondent
Jessica E. PerlickOffice of the Nevada Attorney General, Respondent