No. 21-5015
Reginald Franklin v. Robert LeGrand, Warden, et al.
Tags: certificate-of-appealability due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ninth-circuit post-conviction post-conviction-relief reasonable-jurists trial-counsel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit clearly erred in denying Franklin's request for a certificate of appealability
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit clearly erred in denying Franklin’s request for a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would find it debatable whether Franklin could show he was deprived of the ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and on post-conviction? i
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-30
Waiver of right of respondent Robert LeGrand, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
2021-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 5, 2021)
Attorneys
Reginald Franklin
Robert LeGrand, Warden, et al.
Jessica E. Perlick — Office of the Nevada Attorney General, Respondent
Jessica E. Perlick — Office of the Nevada Attorney General, Respondent