Whether reasonable jurists would determine there was sufficient evidence to support convictions

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : (1) Whether the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana properly conclude that Reasonable Jurists would determine there was sufficient evidence to support Mr. Kurz's convictions? (2) Whether the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana properly conclude that Reasonable Jurists would have determined that Mr. Kurz was convicted with the use of Ex Post Facto Law; Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 123 S.Ct. 2446, 156 L.Ed. 544, (2003); in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? (3) Whether the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and United States District Court _ for the Western District of Louisiana properly conclude that Reasonable Jurists would determine that Mr. Kurz was denied Effective Assistance of Counsel? ii