No. 21-5267

Robert Drawn, IV v. Robert Neuschmid, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-claims district-court-assessment due-process equal-protection judicial-review legal-standard qualified-immunity reasonable-jurists summary-judgment writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did petitioner demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED DID PETITIONER DEMONSTRATE THAT REASONABLE JURISTS WOULD FIND | | THE DISTRICT COURT'S ASSESSMENT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS DEBATABLE OR WRONG... | | . |

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-02
Waiver of right of respondent Neuschmid, Warden to respond filed.
Main Document
2021-06-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Neuschmid, Warden
Gregory A. Ott — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Robert Drawn
Robert Drawn IV — Petitioner