No. 20-6581
Kimberly Hanzlik v. Joseph Joseph, Superintendent, Bedford Hills Correctional Facility
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel miller-el-standard reasonable-jurists second-circuit unreasonable-application-of-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the Second Circuit's denial of Petitioner's application for a certificate of appealability unreasonable
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Was the Second Circuit’s denial of Petitioner’s application for a certificate of appealability unreasonable based on the standards for certificate of appealability to issue as set forth in Mil/er-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322 (2003), where Petitioner demonstrated a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right about which reasonable jurists can disagree? i
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-11
Waiver of right of respondent Superintendent Joseph Joseph, Bedford Hills Correctional Facility to respond filed.
2020-12-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Kimberly Hanzlik
Irving Cohen — Irving Cohen, Atty. at Law, Petitioner
Irving Cohen — Irving Cohen, Atty. at Law, Petitioner
Superintendent Joseph Joseph, Bedford Hills Correctional Facility
Lisa Ellen Fleischmann — NYS Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Lisa Ellen Fleischmann — NYS Attorney General's Office, Respondent