No. 22-5850
Justin Michael Fenney v. Tracy Beltz, Warden
IFP
Tags: 2253-statute 28-usc-2253 appellate-relief certificate-of-appealability conviction factual-support federal-court-review habeas-corpus judicial-discretion reasonable-jurists
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a federal court may find that 'reasonable jurists would not disagree' about the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 where there is no factual support for maintaining the conviction
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. In deciding whether to issue a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, may a federal court find that “reasonable jurists would not disagree” about the denial of relief where there remains no factual support for maintaining the conviction. 2
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 17, 2022)