No. 19-7788
Ulises Corrales Vega v. Connie Horton, Warden
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process frivolous-claim habeas-corpus in-forma-pauperis judicial-review legal-standard reasonable-jurists split standing summary-dismissal writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-04-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the petitioner raise a substantial constitutional claim that was not so patently false or frivolous as to warrant summary dismissal?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTION[S] PRESENTED I. DID THE PETITIONER RAISE A SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIM THAT WAS NOT SO PATENTLY FALSE OR FRIVOLOUS AS TO WARRANT SUMMARY DISMISSAL? Petitioner answers “yes” The State answers “no” Reasonable jurists are “split” i
Docket Entries
2020-04-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
2020-01-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2020)