Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a state court's divided decision on the merits of a federal constitutional claim demonstrate that reasonable jurists would debate the claim's merits such that a certificate of appealability should issue?
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does a state court’s divided decision on the merits of a federal constitutional claim demonstrate that reasonable jurists would debate the claim’s merits such that a certificate of appealability should issue , as recognized by three Justices of this Court, the Seventh Circuit, the Fifth Circuit , and district courts in the Third Circuit , or may a federal court decline to issue a certificate of appealability in such circumstances, as done by the Third Circuit below, the Eighth Circuit, and district courts in the First, Third, and Eleventh Circuits?
2025-12-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-05
Brief of Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. in opposition submitted.
2025-12-05
Brief of respondents Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. in opposition filed.
2025-12-05
Brief of respondents Laurel Harry, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. in opposition filed.
2025-10-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 15, 2025.
2025-10-15
Motion of Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. for an extension of time submitted.
2025-10-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 13, 2025 to December 15, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2025)
2025-09-08
Application (25A261) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until October 8, 2025.
2025-08-28
Application (25A261) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 8, 2025 to November 7, 2025, submitted to Justice Alito.