No. 18-8695
Deontray Vershon Tate v. Jeff Titus, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability federal-court habeas-corpus procedural-grounds reasonable-jurists statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a federal court may find that 'reasonable jurists would not disagree' about the denial of relief on procedural grounds where other courts have resolved the same issue, on similar facts, in a manner favorable to habeas petitioner's position
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. In deciding whether to issue a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, may a federal court find that “reasonable jurists would not disagree” about the denial of relief on procedural grounds where other courts have resolved the same issue, on similar facts, in a manner favorable to habeas petitioner’s position? ii
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-11
Waiver of right of respondent Jeff Titus to respond filed.
2019-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Deontray Tate
Zachary Allen Longsdorf — Longsdorf Law Firm, PLC, Petitioner
Zachary Allen Longsdorf — Longsdorf Law Firm, PLC, Petitioner