Whether the criminal defendant was denied meaningful appellate review when the district court destroyed the only copy of a redacted indictment used by the jury in its deliberations

Question Presented is: What is the correct standard to determine whether a criminal defendant is denied meaningful appellate review when the district court destroys the only copy of a redacted indictment used by the jury in its deliberations, and who’s burden is it to show whether the jury was given the correct version of the indictment? ii RELATED CASES e United States v. Frye, No. 1:17-cr-00115-WO-1, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Judgment entered May 238, 2018. e United States v. Frye, No. 18-4346, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth District. Judgment entered May 20, 2019.