No. 18-8690
Dagoberto Ontiveros v. Michael Pacheco, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: anders-appeal anders-v-california appellate-review constitutional-law criminal-procedure defendant-rights direct-appeal due-process legal-ethics legal-frivolity right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a finding of frivolity is required when rejecting a criminal defendant's direct appeal under Anders v. California
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED When rejecting a criminal defendant’s direct appeal under the provisions of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), must there be a finding of frivolity? ii rm ,
Docket Entries
2019-08-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-06-06
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-12
Waiver of right of respondents Pacheco, Warden to respond filed.
2019-04-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 8, 2019)
Attorneys
Dagoberto Ontiveros
Dagoberto Ontiveros — Petitioner
Pacheco, Warden