| 24-732 |
Children's Health Defense v. Meta Platforms, Inc., a Delaware corporation, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-01-13 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
content-moderation first-amendment government-collaboration interactive-platform speech-suppression state-action |
Does an interactive computer service provider become a state actor when it collaborates with government officials to suppress specific viewpoints, the… |
| 23-1189 |
Jeryl Turco v. City of Englewood, New Jersey |
Third Circuit |
2024-05-03 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedRelisted (11) |
abortion-clinic buffer-zones civil-rights content-neutrality due-process first-amendment free-speech hill-v-colorado public-forum sidewalk-counseling speech-suppression standing |
Whether the City of Englewood's speech-free buffer zones, including zones outside an abortion clinic, violate the First Amendment |
| 23A754 |
Harisadhan Patra, et ux. v. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2024-02-15 |
Presumed Complete |
|
chilling-effect first-amendment inter-circuit-split retaliation speech-suppression summary-judgment |
Whether the First Amendment protects public employees from prospective speech suppression and retaliatory actions when raising concerns about institut… |
| 22-6517 |
William F. Kaetz v. Freda L. Wolfson, Judge, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2023-01-11 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-violations content-discrimination first-amendment free-speech government-accountability government-retaliation speech-suppression viewpoint-discrimination |
First-Amendment-retaliation |
| 22-5922 |
Andrew S. Andersen v. Jennifer Shaffer, Executive Director, California Board of Parole Hearings |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-10-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
beliefs-thoughts civil-rights due-process due-process-clause first-amendment free-speech government-benefit parole parole-regulations speech-suppression turner-test |
When a plaintiff alleges denial of a governmental benefit based on beliefs/thoughts and the benefit is conditioned on adopting government-approved bel… |
| 20-1598 |
Project Veritas Action Fund v. Rachael S. Rollins, in Her Official Capacity as District Attorney for Suffolk County, Massachusetts |
First Circuit |
2021-05-17 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-rights facial-overbreadth first-amendment free-speech newsgathering ripeness secret-recording speech-suppression standing |
Whether the First Amendment protects the right to secretly record oral communications |