No. 22-6517

William F. Kaetz v. Freda L. Wolfson, Judge, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2023-01-11
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-violations content-discrimination first-amendment free-speech government-accountability government-retaliation speech-suppression viewpoint-discrimination
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-04-14 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

First-Amendment-retaliation

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED When a United States Citizen attempts to correct the errors of the United States government by filing a civil complaint, and the United States government retaliates and criminalizes the citizen, should the government and its employees involved be held accountable for offending the Constitution with 1s* Amendment retaliation? For acts offending the Constitution, totalitarian acts, should the government and its employees involved be held accountable? . Should the government use content and viewpoint discriminations to alter and suppress evidence and to manipulate speech to create a crime to silence the speaker because that speech goes against totalitarians in government? | . 2 CONTENTS Parties from the Third Circuit Appeal Case No. 22-1456 .ccce00-6 Parties from the Third Circuit Appeal Case No. 22-1476 .6 CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED.8 Constitutional Argument to Correct Government Errors .10 REASONS TO GRANTING THIS CERTIORARI .0.0 cece LA This Area of the Law is Badly in Need of the This Court's Authoritative Voice LA This Case is Likely to Produce an Opinion that Will Give Useful Guidance to the Lower Courts.cc:c

Docket Entries

2023-04-17
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
2023-03-22
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-13
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2023-03-06
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
2023-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/3/2023.
2023-02-10
Waiver of right of respondent Wolfson, Freda, et al. to respond filed.
2022-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 10, 2023)

Attorneys

William Kaetz
William F. Kaetz — Petitioner
William F. Kaetz — Petitioner
Wolfson, Freda, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent