Whether failure to serve the brief was fatal error

QUESTIONS PRESENTED L. Whether failure to serve anyone my Delaware Supreme Court Brief, after the Defendant, President Trump, was removed from office was fatal error, given no relief could be made by Defendant, Former President Trump, since only a sitting President can afford relief, and it was not ripe to move to substitute or serve President Biden without a favorable determination on standing. I. Whether the Delaware Supreme Court erred in concluding Executive Order 13798 is Constitutional by misapplying arguments related to different executive orders Executive Orders 14015, 13831, 13559, 13198, 138199, 18279, 13342 and 13397, and by overlooking my argument that Executive Order No. 13798, is unconstitutional in violation of the Establishment clause by allowing religions, through churches, temples, mosques or other religious organizations to back government parties or government agents or potential government agents with money, donations, support or otherwise, giving the blasphemous backing of God and religions for the vanity of mere men in place of God, upsetting me with foreseeing physical manifestation of emotional distress including grinding of teeth, tears and at times increased heart pressure, in addition to establishing government religion which substantially burdens my free exercise of religion by those who adopt Trumpreligious beliefs. III. Whether the Delaware Supreme Court erred in concluding the exception, capable of repetition yet evading review did not apply to prevent this i matter to prevent it from being moot since former President Trump may become President, and since President Biden may be substituted for Former President Trump to dissolve government religion to reduce the substantial burden upon my free exercise of religion pursuant to Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 USCS § 2000bb (1-4), should standing be found. IV. Pending a favorable determination on standing, whether I should be permitted to continue this suit, by seeking to substitute President Biden for former President Trump in this action to prevent the continued establishment of government-religion by President Biden’s continued enforcement of Executive Order 13798 and passage of Executive Orders 14015, and enforcement of related Executive Orders 13831, 13559, 13198, 13199, 13279, 13342 and 13397. V. Whether the Delaware Supreme Court erred in concluding I did not have standing to seek to enjoin former President Trump from establishing government-religion by overlooking the misconduct establishing government religion, and the causal link, the direct harm to me substantially burdening my free exercise of religion, speech and association, causing emotional distress resulting in physical symptoms by his conduct blaspheming my God, tears and, increased heart pressure, and attacks by strangers adopting beliefs and even by court agents and arms in this case, based on my perceived religious affiliation as anti-Trump: religion, but for the Presidents’ misconduct, and the relief that would ii afford me a remedy, personally, as a party of one, the enjoining of the President and future Presidents from continued establishment of government religion by inter alias enforcing certain Executive orders.