Whether the Michigan Court of Appeals erred in granting a new trial based on an inconsistent jury verdict, even though irreconcilable jury verdicts are not grounds for relief

STATEMENT OF THE QUESTION I. Irreconcilable jury verdicts are not grounds for relief, and courts are not to speculate as to why a jury returned an inconsistent verdict. Respondent’s jury here returned an inconsistent verdict, which the Michigan Court of Appeals speculated was based on confusion and on that basis granted Respondent a new trial. Did the Court of Appeals err in granting relief? “ie