| 23A1035 |
Dedric Dixon v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-05-21 |
Presumed Complete |
|
constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy felony-murder ineffective-assistance jury-verdicts |
Whether a criminal defendant's constitutional rights are violated when he is convicted of felony murder after being acquitted of intentional murder ba… |
| 21-6902 |
Daliyl Raaid Muhammad v. Eric Armel, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Fayette, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2022-01-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
aedpa aedpa-standard circuit-split collateral-review criminal-procedure federal-prejudice-standards harmless-error jury-verdict jury-verdicts supreme-court-precedent |
Whether the Third Circuit erred in holding that United States v. Powell precludes consideration of the jury's other verdicts when conducting harmless … |
| 21-6425 |
Maycol Mendez-Maradiaga v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-11-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure drug-activity entrapment government-inducement inconsistent-verdicts jury-verdicts predisposition prior-experience willing-participant |
Whether the government must show predisposition at the time of inducement in an entrapment case |
| 18A1232 |
Time Warner Cable, Inc., et al. v. Sprint Communications Company, L.P. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-05-29 |
Presumed Complete |
|
apportionment federal-circuit jury-verdicts patent-damages patent-infringement written-description |
Whether the Federal Circuit improperly deviated from longstanding Supreme Court precedents on patent damages apportionment by authorizing unapportione… |
| 18-200 |
Michigan v. Charles Damon Jones |
Michigan |
2018-08-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process inconsistent-verdicts judicial-discretion jury-confusion jury-instructions jury-nullification jury-verdict jury-verdicts legal-standard new-trial sufficiency-of-evidence trial-procedure verdict-inconsistency |
Whether the Michigan Court of Appeals erred in granting a new trial based on an inconsistent jury verdict, even though irreconcilable jury verdicts ar… |