No. 21-6425

Maycol Mendez-Maradiaga v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-procedure drug-activity entrapment government-inducement inconsistent-verdicts jury-verdicts predisposition prior-experience willing-participant
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the government must show predisposition at the time of inducement in an entrapment case

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. In an entrapment case where the defendant has met his burden on the threshold element of inducement, may the government establish predisposition merely by showing that the defendant had some remote prior experience with drug activity, or must the government show that the defendant was an eager and willing participant at the time the government’s course of inducement began? 2. Whether United States v. Powell, 469 U.S. 57 (1984) — which insulated criminal convictions from review on the ground that the jury had returned irreconcilably inconsistent verdicts — should be overruled. i INTERESTED PARTIES Pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 14.1(b)@), Mr. Mendez Maradiaga submits that there are no

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 27, 2021)

Attorneys

Maycol Mendez-Maradiaga
Tracy M. DreispulFederal Public Defender Southern District of Florida, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent