No. 18-250
Tu Ying Chen v. Suffolk County Community College, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights court-judgment defendant-actions due-process evidence false-evidence judicial-procedure legal-review legal-standards misconduct plaintiff-claims standing wrongful-probation wrongful-termination
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA EmploymentDiscrimina
Arbitration ERISA EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was there misconduct by and false evidence submitted by the Defendants?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED . 1. Was there misconduct by and false evidence : submitted by the Defendants? 2. Why were the facts provided by the Plaintiff not used in the court judgment? .
Docket Entries
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-08-30
Waiver of right of respondents Suffolk County Community College, et al. to respond filed.
2018-08-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 27, 2018)
2018-08-21
Application (18A185) denied by Justice Ginsburg.
2018-08-16
Application (18A185) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 22, 2018 to October 21, 2018, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.