No. 18-346
Estate of Jason Allen Smallwood v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction implied-contract implied-in-fact-contract jurisdiction jurisdictional-bar scheuer-v-rhodes sovereign-immunity standing statutory-interpretation tucker-act veterans-benefits
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-11-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-trial-court-properly-determined-the-estate's-complaint-must-fail
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. In the face of Scheuer v. Rhodes, whether the trial court could have properly determined that the Estate’s complaint must fail? 2. Whether 38 U.S.C. § 511(a) can preclude Tucker Act jurisdiction in light of a nonfrivolous allegation for breach of implied-infact contract with the United States?
Docket Entries
2018-11-05
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 17, 2018)
Attorneys
The Estate of Jason Allen Smallwood
Jonathan Bryan Kelly — Jonathan Kelly & Associates, PLLC, Petitioner
Jonathan Bryan Kelly — Jonathan Kelly & Associates, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent