| 24-6480 |
Andrew J. Johnston v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
2025-02-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure criminal-procedure federal-statute habeas-corpus jurisdictional-bar post-conviction-relief |
Does 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(b)(1) apply to claims brought in second or successive motions for post-conviction relief under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255? |
| 23-5480 |
Jesus C. More v. Florida |
Florida |
2023-08-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure competency-hearing due-process jurisdiction jurisdictional-bar procedural-rules remedies separation-of-powers subject-matter-jurisdiction |
Question not identified |
| 22-7892 |
Sherri Jefferson v. State Bar of Georgia, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-06-29 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights claim-preclusion conspiracy due-process federal-jurisdiction judicial-review jurisdictional-bar racial-discrimination standing state-court statutory-interpretation |
Whether the federal courts have jurisdiction to examine 42 U.S.C. 1981, 1983 and 1985 claims not intertwined with a state court judgment |
| 22-239 |
Krishna Maharaj v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-09-14 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
28-usc-2244 appellate-review court-of-appeals evidence evidence-consideration federal-procedure habeas-corpus jurisdiction jurisdictional-bar successive-petition |
Whether a district court is jurisdictionally barred from considering evidence supporting a claim in a second or successive habeas petition that the co… |
| 21-796 |
Marchand & Rossi, L.L.P., nka Marchand Law, L.L.P. v. Bryan K. White, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-11-30 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
false-claims-act first-to-file-rule fraud fraud-prosecution jurisdictional-bar parallel-state-laws qui-tam statutory-interpretation whistleblower |
Whether the FCA first-to-file rule allows dismissal of independently viable claims |
| 20-1359 |
Superama Corporation, Inc., dba USA Sumo v. Tokyo Broadcasting System Television, Inc., et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-03-26 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
arbaugh-v-y-h-corp copyright copyright-act extraterritorial-application jurisdiction jurisdictional-bar morrison-v-national-australia-bank ninth-circuit reed-elsevier-v-muchnick statutory-requirement subject-matter-jurisdiction |
Whether the presumption against extraterritorial application, applied in the context of the U.S. Copyright Act, creates a jurisdictional bar |
| 19-1170 |
Ricky W. Campbell v. Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-03-26 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-exhaustion causal-connection civil-procedure civil-rights due-process eeoc-filing employment-discrimination federal-rules-of-civil-procedure jurisdictional-bar standing staub-v-proctor-hospital supreme-court-precedent |
issue being raised |
| 19-944 |
Scott A. Seldin v. Theodore M. Seldin, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-01-28 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
arbitration civil-procedure functus-officio jurisdiction jurisdictional-bar law-of-the-case mandate-rule rule-of-mandate statutory-interpretation trust-accounting |
Whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the district court's dismissal of a narrow statutory trust accounting action |
| 18-7924 |
Clifton Donell Lyles v. Angela Broach, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-02-12 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review civil-procedure due-process federal-courts fourth-circuit issue-preclusion judicial-procedure jurisdictional-bar rooker-feldman-doctrine standing |
Did the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals err by allowing the Rooker-Feldman doctrine to be used to grant motion for issue preclusion? |
| 18-346 |
Estate of Jason Allen Smallwood v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2018-09-17 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction implied-contract implied-in-fact-contract jurisdiction jurisdictional-bar scheuer-v-rhodes sovereign-immunity standing statutory-interpretation tucker-act veterans-benefits |
whether-the-trial-court-properly-determined-the-estate's-complaint-must-fail |
| 18-5392 |
Quitman Carter v. B. E. Blackmon, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-07-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2241 28-usc-2255 actual-innocence armed-career-criminal-act foreclosed-claims habeas-corpus johnson-retroactivity johnson-v-united-states jurisdiction jurisdictional-bar retroactivity savings-clause section-2241 section-2255 sentencing |
Whether the Fifth Circuit erred in ruling that Mr. Carter's claims under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 are jurisdictionally barred from consideration because they … |