Whether the Fifth Circuit erred in ruling that Mr. Carter's claims under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 are jurisdictionally barred from consideration because they 'don't fit within the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e)'

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW The underlying issue presented in this § 2241 case is whether Mr. Carter is entitled to resentencing under this Court’s holdings in Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015). However, because the Fifth Circuit never reached the merits of Mr. Carter’s claims, the issue on review before this Court is whether the Fifth Circuit erred by ruling that Mr. Carter’s claims under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 are jurisdictionally barred from consideration because they “don’t fit within the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e).” See Fifth Circuit Opinion, p. 1.! ' The Fifth Circuit’s Opinion in this case is attached hereto as