No. 18-38

Illya Erwin v. Department of the Army

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2018-07-06
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 5-cfr-315-804 5-usc-1221 5-usc-2302 administrative-law civil-rights due-process federal-circuit personnel-action probationary-employee prohibited-personnel-practice termination-defense whistleblower whistleblower-protection
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2018-12-07 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the agency can claim it would have taken the same personnel action absent whistleblower disclosure based on grounds not stated in the termination notice

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether, in defense of a whistleblower claim of wrongful termination by a probationary employee, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 1221, the agency may claim that it would have taken the same personnel action in the absence of such disclosure based upon grounds which were not stated in the notice of termination given pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 315.804(a)? 2. Whether, in defense of a whistleblower claim of wrongful termination by a probationary employee, pursuant to5 U.S.C. § 1221, the agency may claim that it would have taken the same personnel action in the absence of such disclosure based upon grounds which were specifically rejected by the agency in the first instance?

Docket Entries

2018-12-10
Rehearing DENIED.
2018-11-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-10-25
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-30
Waiver of right of respondent Department of the Army to respond filed.
2018-07-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 6, 2018)

Attorneys

Department of the Army
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Illya Erwin
Walter R. SchoettleWalter R. Schoettle, a law corp., Petitioner
Walter R. SchoettleWalter R. Schoettle, a law corp., Petitioner