Whether the trial court may disregard or ignore a party's sworn testimony concerning a material historical fact based upon contradictory inferences arising from unsworn evidence in the summary judgment record

question presented is: 1. Onamotion for summary judgment, whether the trial court may disregard or ignore a party’s sworn testimony concerning a material historical fact based upon contradictory inferences arising from unsworn evidence in the summary judgment record. The Ninth Circuit Panel also affirmed a trial court order granting summary judgment dismissing Hatch’s claims for failure to provide reasonable accommodation under 29 U.S.C. § 791 and 42 U.S.C. § 12112. The Panel found that the Postal Service articulated a nondiscriminatory explanation for Hatch’s treatment, that acollective bargaining agreement required certain jobs be given to employees with greater seniority — and that Hatch failed to show the Postal Service explanation was pretextual. The second question presented is: 2. Under US Airways v. Barnett, 535 U.S. 391 (2000), to show that a proposed accommodation is ordinarily unreasonable, does the employer bear the burden of proving the accommodation would violate the rules of a seniority system or is the employer’s burden simply one of articulating a non-discriminatory reason.