No. 18-5022

Marcus Kalani Watson, aka Kiki Seui, and Rogussia Eddie Allen Danielson v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-06-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act bank-robbery criminal-procedure federal-bank-robbery force-clause sentencing-enhancement slight-force statutory-interpretation stokeling-v-united-states united-states
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether federal bank robbery that requires only slight force is covered by the force clause of 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(3)(A)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED In Stokeling v. United States, No. 17-5554, this Court has granted certiorari to resolve whether a state robbery offense that requires a purposeful use, attempted use, or threatened use of only slight force is picked up by the force clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. §924(e)(2)(B)(i). This case provides an excellent companion case for resolving whether federal bank robbery—which similarly requires a purposeful use, attempted use, or threatened use of only slight force in both its simple and strong-arm variants—is picked up by 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(3)(A)’s nearly identical force clause. i CONTENTS Question Presented L Contents DL AUtHOLItY eee cecc

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2018)

Attorneys

Marcus Kalani Watson, et al.
Peter Christian Wolff Jr. — Petitioner
Peter Christian Wolff Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent