No. 18-506

Dawn L. Hassell, et al. v. Yelp, Inc.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2018-10-18
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: communications-decency-act injunction interactive-computer-services non-party non-party-liability section-230 tortious-content unprotected-content unprotected-speech
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-01-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act bars plaintiffs from obtaining an injunction enforcing a valid final judgment against a non-party who controls the posting of tortious and unprotected content

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Section 230 of the Communications : Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. § 230 et seq., which precludes holding certain interactive computer services “liable” for content posted by users, bars plaintiffs from obtaining an injunction enforcing a valid final judgment against a non-party who controls the posting of tortious and unprotected content? 100094535; 12}

Docket Entries

2019-01-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-04
Reply of petitioner Dawn L. Hassell filed. (Distributed)
2019-01-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.
2018-12-18
Respondent's Rule 29.6 Corporate Disclosure Statement received.
2018-12-14
Brief of respondent Yelp, INC., in opposition filed.
2018-11-14
Response Requested. (Due December 14, 2018)
2018-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-23
Waiver of right of respondent Yelp, INC., to respond filed.
2018-10-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 19, 2018)

Attorneys

Dawn L. Hassell
Charles John HarderHARDER, LLP, Petitioner
Charles John HarderHARDER, LLP, Petitioner
Dawn HassellHassell Law Group, Petitioner
Dawn HassellHassell Law Group, Petitioner
Yelp, INC.,
Thomas R. BurkeDavis Wright Tremaine LLP, Respondent
Thomas R. BurkeDavis Wright Tremaine LLP, Respondent