No. 18-506
Dawn L. Hassell, et al. v. Yelp, Inc.
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: communications-decency-act injunction interactive-computer-services non-party non-party-liability section-230 tortious-content unprotected-content unprotected-speech
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Privacy
FirstAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-01-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act bars plaintiffs from obtaining an injunction enforcing a valid final judgment against a non-party who controls the posting of tortious and unprotected content
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Section 230 of the Communications : Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. § 230 et seq., which precludes holding certain interactive computer services “liable” for content posted by users, bars plaintiffs from obtaining an injunction enforcing a valid final judgment against a non-party who controls the posting of tortious and unprotected content? 100094535; 12}
Docket Entries
2019-01-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-04
Reply of petitioner Dawn L. Hassell filed. (Distributed)
2019-01-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.
2018-12-18
Respondent's Rule 29.6 Corporate Disclosure Statement received.
2018-12-14
Brief of respondent Yelp, INC., in opposition filed.
2018-11-14
Response Requested. (Due December 14, 2018)
2018-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-23
Waiver of right of respondent Yelp, INC., to respond filed.
2018-10-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 19, 2018)
Attorneys
Dawn L. Hassell
Charles John Harder — HARDER, LLP, Petitioner
Charles John Harder — HARDER, LLP, Petitioner
Dawn Hassell — Hassell Law Group, Petitioner
Dawn Hassell — Hassell Law Group, Petitioner
Yelp, INC.,
Thomas R. Burke — Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Respondent
Thomas R. Burke — Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Respondent